Section 28 propaganda
delivered by feeble-minded pundits in UK media & political life, to confuse and befuddle the general population who are unaware of the transcult erasure of sex.
I’ll make this short and sweet. Over 5 years of an education “in all things LGBTQ+” which I promised my radicalised and trans-identified daughter I’d take, nothing prepared me for the absolute nonsense of this apples v potatoes comparison. A quick explainer about SOGI conflation follows for newbies.
Needless to say, I’m a straight, left-leaning liberal LGB-supporting ally who was actually there; on a few of those Section 28 demos at the time; as a recently-graduated student in support of my gay and lesbian friends.
No, “trans people” were not there. There may have been a few transvestites or transexuals present, I wouldn’t know for sure, and it wouldn’t have bothered me in any case. They weren’t rebranded by a cult back then; in that hedonistic, liberating, stereotype-busting, be-who-you-wanna-be decade..
But I DO know, that no-one was there marching in support of the appropriation of women’s rights, bodies, spaces, privacies & boundaries. Nor were they marching for the sterilisation or surgical amputations on children and teens, OR “born in the wrong body” theory. Or for sex denialism. They marched for equal rights for LGB.
The trans/queer pushers for sex denialism - for the idea that gender identities supplant the primacy of the sex binary - are using the very real homophobia of Section 28 as “evidence” of a trans genocide - by suggesting that the homophobia of the eighties is:
< equivalent to current objections & concerns about the indoctrination of gender ideology within schools, universities, organisations & institutions, and all areas of public life >
It’s what made Chris Bryant @RhonddaBryant MP stand up in the House of Commons this week and announce that he felt “unsafe”, before Kemi Badenoch MP @KemiBadenoch delivered the most passionate and commited defense of GC/self ID reform by ANY MP I’ve ever seen. This week in the UK the era of #nodebate was terminated, for good.
But let’s start at the beginning, and see how the contagion grows, once T+ comes riding in, inside the LGB Trojan Horse. It all starts with the homophobic unacceptability of homosexuality as a “pretended family relationship”
And so it begins, with the Local Government Act 1988, homosexual men soon became smeared as “predatory”; grooming young people into homosexuality
And its legacy continues, mirroring confusion between sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI), and the larger conflation between sex and gender
The conflation over Sexual Orientation & Gender Identities (SOGI) locks in with it, and triangulates with, other arguments used to discredit the pushback
Ben Bradshaw MP has never had to look closer. He aligns his views with Stonewall or TRA’s like the young Twink above. Gay men seem to find it impossible to separate sexual orientation based on same-sex attraction, from gender identities based on “feelings”, flimflam, fresh air and personality traits
Leader of the Opposition, Keir Starmer, and young “progressive” MP Nadia Whittome, lumping LGBTQ+ together, in one oppressed, amorphous group. The adoption of this ideological weapon by lefties allows proponents of gender ideology therefore to smear detractors as right wing, homophobic bigots, when the reverse is true - homophobia manifests by transing away the gay: “Wouldn’t you rather have a ‘straight’ daughter (by transition) than a gay son?”
Allowing top-sheet journalists & MP’s to assume that explorative therapy to help children and young people explore their distress, is like locking-up and punishing LGB people in order to turn them straight, is 180 degrees NOT the same thing.
This sort of thing doesn’t help. TRA’s deliberately keep the conflation going
Nor does trans/queer education via TV drama, by gay men like Russell T Davies who also refuses to see it. I’m grateful we have great writers like @jo_bartosch
The BBC again. Check the ages of some of these presenters to see how old they were, when Section 28 was hitting education hard. And yet many of these media trans allies claim to have been “traumatised” by Section 28 as they virtue signal their way across the airwaves
Malcolm Clark always calls it out. Malcolm Clark @TwisterFilm
Stella Creasy MP and @PinkNews. The youth vote is a huge prize with a general election due next year
Another gay elder duped by the idea that LGBTQ+ “education” ISN’T infused with gender ideology indoctrination & queer theory. And people wonder why LGB want to be separate from T+
Whose rights are you talking about Keir? The rights of same-sex attracted people? Or gender worshippers who seek to erase the reality of sex, by supplanting it with gender? Yes, Section 28 was homophobic. But conflating it with todays objections to an ideology ruining young peoples lives & families obscures the intent to erase sex & same-sex attraction. Ditch the T
Please support
LGB Alliance @AllianceLGB Sex Matters @SexMattersOrg TransgenderTrend @Transgendertrd Genspect