Behind the Curtain of Oz
or Telling It Like It Is
Indifference and Indoctrination are the 2 biggest drivers of the maintenance of gender ideology and its continuing presence within every area of public life. This weeks intended post was derailed a couple of days ago by the the inane tweeting about a report on what Nicola Sturgeon (First Minister of Scotland) is claimed to have said, and Natasha Devon (an LBC radio presenter, author and campaigner) commenting on it.
On the surface (& perhaps to newbies) it seems as if Nicola Sturgeon is yet another politician trying to be kind and inclusive, and in the process not really getting it or “seeing the bigger picture” about womens rights and male predatory behaviour & abuse towards children AND women.
And again, on the surface, it might seem that Natasha Devon is at best virtue signalling for the benefit of her audience and media profile. After all, she’s spoken with her trans friends about the issue. So that’s all good then. She must be on the right side of history and that’s all there is to it.
I think Wilful Ignorance does far more damage than we recognise. This is not carelessness or laziness about looking at a difficult issue - this is choosing not to look, for political advancement. Sturgeons utterances on these matters are a direct appeal to the youth vote, in order to push for Independence because the youthful voters are the most susceptible to gender ideology propaganda. Get them on your side and fuck the consequences; expediency is all that matters.
To speak with authority on the idea that < trans-identified men could not be abusive but abusive men can be abusive > is a huge betrayal, and a cowardly sidestep. It’s a wordy workaround that decouples men from trans-identified men by claiming only 1 of those constituencies can be harmful. First Minister of All Handmaidens, I salute you. Say the wrong thing, think the wrong thought, and these MEN would have you burned at the stake. Actually, scratch that; you don’t have to DO anything for that to happen to women with opinions and beliefs.
The following screenshots comprise just 60 examples from a folder of 600 trans-identified males presenting danger and threat, of the lengths that men will go to, driven by their AGP and attendant narcissism and paraphilic drive, to destroy womens and childrens spaces, boundaries, and bodies. This is trans rights everybody. These screenshots are all from a larger folder called “Gender - Men Gain, Women Lose” because at every turn - no matter how you look at it, this single, brutal truth exposes its ugly head wherever you look behind the curtain of Oz. If you’re brave enough to look.
So I captioned each screenshot I took with a more truthful statement than the words that the screenshot itself presented me with. Each screenshot is therefore captioned “this man” or “this man is….” and then the truth is returned and the image is re-described by a new caption. The screenshots here are but One Tenth of all the screenshots I took over 4 years seeing if it was possible to find for example, a good role model trans-identified male, maybe? - someone that somewhere, some confused kid might be able to look up to without being groomed or indoctrinated - a sane, rational, non-woman-hating, empathic, community-spirited, humane individual. I know they exist and I’ve read their words and spoken to a few - but I just can’t find any. And so I just kept screenshotting away.
Doesn’t matter how you identify, if you’re a trans-identified man, you’re still a man. And men will always be the takers, and they will always take those opportunities, enjoy that privilege. Where Gender is concerned, ONLY men benefit. Even if they’re caught, they still get away with lighter sentences - “because they’re trans”. How can any woman wave this away? Not want to look? actually believe that it’s better to “just not entertain the idea at all”, as Natasha does? Instead, her trans friends have told her it’s wrong to say or think this or that. Well to paraphrase Mandy Rice-Davies, “Well they would say that, wouldn’t they?”
Trans-identified men have a lot at stake and a lot of general goodwill to lose in their never-ending performative victimhood. They drown out the sane and rational trans-identified males, just like they attack those traitorous young surgically and emotionally-scarred trans-identified young women (the “detransitioners”), who expose this dangerous and abusive cult and will no longer provide validation or protection for the men who urge them on. These are the men who sought validation from our daughter, and encouraged her “transition”, and I will never apologise for continuing to explain how and why this happened. I will always stand up for our daughter and write the brutal truth about how we lost her to the cult. Nicola Sturgeon and Natasha Devon, I’d be happy to take tea with you and fill in any knowledge gaps. And the same goes for any UK politician or media journalist. My main story at the top of my sub stack “We Used To Have A Daughter” is all the “unevidenced” evidence you need Natasha. Mermaids is just the start.
The Good The Bad The Ugly
Elsewhere in ScotGov:
Amazing collection of data, DYC! The "nice ones" usually turn into the victimhood screamers if an ex-wife like me starts mentioning a few facts; why does my ex-husband insist on being called the mother of our children, why did he commit fraud in family court twice to get out of paying child support when he was in an equity contract and became COO, why did he dress in sexually provocative mini-skirts when I was dropping off the children. He's "one of the nice ones" for sure.
Significant Michael Biggs study debunking all of the "Dutch protocols" from their N = 70 studies, that is to say, oops, no this one died on the operating table, N = 69, on my blog, just posted today. Link to the actual paper, lengthy but worth the time there also:
https://wordpress.com/post/uteheggengrasswidow.wordpress.com/4857