Amazing collection of data, DYC! The "nice ones" usually turn into the victimhood screamers if an ex-wife like me starts mentioning a few facts; why does my ex-husband insist on being called the mother of our children, why did he commit fraud in family court twice to get out of paying child support when he was in an equity contract and became COO, why did he dress in sexually provocative mini-skirts when I was dropping off the children. He's "one of the nice ones" for sure.
Significant Michael Biggs study debunking all of the "Dutch protocols" from their N = 70 studies, that is to say, oops, no this one died on the operating table, N = 69, on my blog, just posted today. Link to the actual paper, lengthy but worth the time there also:
Yes, there's so much resistance to the notion that "even the nice ones" are groomy simply by befriending vulnerable children and exploiting their trust by telling them "See, I'm just like you, I've had to live inside this alien body all my life. You've got the chance to break free now, become your authentic self and live your best life before its too late". It's the hardest nut to crack for newbies, because they always default to "Why do you HATE tw so much?" because in their own live they've been groomed to believe that tw are the most oppressed, most marginalised, but brave and stunning etc etc It's like a mass social psychopathy. The only thing I can do is link it in to the story of how our own daughter was groomed like this. As for the Dutch Protocols, I was shocked to learn this only came about through skewed questioning to a handful-sized sample, I'll go over that study again, thanks for resharing it Ute
Here's today's post with links to the 6 major studies debunking the Dutch Protocols and Jack Turban "research" as well as flawed methods involving so-called "Informed Consent." Please copy links and use or forward my post as needs arise. Best to you, Denton.
Amazing collection of data, DYC! The "nice ones" usually turn into the victimhood screamers if an ex-wife like me starts mentioning a few facts; why does my ex-husband insist on being called the mother of our children, why did he commit fraud in family court twice to get out of paying child support when he was in an equity contract and became COO, why did he dress in sexually provocative mini-skirts when I was dropping off the children. He's "one of the nice ones" for sure.
Significant Michael Biggs study debunking all of the "Dutch protocols" from their N = 70 studies, that is to say, oops, no this one died on the operating table, N = 69, on my blog, just posted today. Link to the actual paper, lengthy but worth the time there also:
https://wordpress.com/post/uteheggengrasswidow.wordpress.com/4857
Yes, there's so much resistance to the notion that "even the nice ones" are groomy simply by befriending vulnerable children and exploiting their trust by telling them "See, I'm just like you, I've had to live inside this alien body all my life. You've got the chance to break free now, become your authentic self and live your best life before its too late". It's the hardest nut to crack for newbies, because they always default to "Why do you HATE tw so much?" because in their own live they've been groomed to believe that tw are the most oppressed, most marginalised, but brave and stunning etc etc It's like a mass social psychopathy. The only thing I can do is link it in to the story of how our own daughter was groomed like this. As for the Dutch Protocols, I was shocked to learn this only came about through skewed questioning to a handful-sized sample, I'll go over that study again, thanks for resharing it Ute
Here's today's post with links to the 6 major studies debunking the Dutch Protocols and Jack Turban "research" as well as flawed methods involving so-called "Informed Consent." Please copy links and use or forward my post as needs arise. Best to you, Denton.
https://uteheggengrasswidow.wordpress.com/2022/10/15/jon-stewart-read-these-6-references-compendium-of-critiques-concur-affirmation-huge-flaws-no-valid-data/